Psychiatric Times Editor invites readership to submit views on DSM-5 for potential publication
December 20, 2011
Editor of Psychiatric Times invites its readership to submit views on DSM-5 for potential publication
Post #117 Shortlink: http://wp.me/pKrrB-1sx
Although the current DSM-5 Development Timeline has a third draft scheduled for release in January-February, 2012, for a two month period for public comment, this final draft is expected to be delayed until spring, pending completion of the DSM-5 field trials.
In this November 9, 2011 report by Deborah Brouser for Medcape Medical News, DSM-5 Task Force vice-chair, Darrel Regier, MD, says “no later than May 2012.”
“…Although the routine clinical settings field trials were expected to be completed by the end of December, it has been extended to around March 2012. Dr. Regier said that this will probably push back the final public feedback period to no later than May 2012.”
When the third and final draft has been published, a notice and links will be posted on my sites with instructions on how to register with the DSM-5 Development site for submitting feedback to the Task Force and 13 work groups.
According to Darrel Regier, Vice-Chair of the DSM-5 Task Force, the specific diagnostic categories that received most comments in the second public review of draft proposals, in May-July, 2011, were sexual and gender identity disorders, followed closely by somatic symptom disorders and anxiety disorders.
December 16, 2011
In a brief Editorial entitled The Debate Over DSM-5: We Invite Your Views, James L. Knoll IV, MD, Editor, Psychiatric Times, clarifies Psychiatric Times’s position with regard to the journal’s intent behind posting the many blogs about DSM-5 that appear on its web site.
Dr Knoll encourages and invites readers to submit their viewpoints on DSM-5 “in the spirit of collegial and scientific investigation.”
Dr Knoll writes that manuscripts and letters sent to editor@PsychiatricTimes.com will be reviewed for possible publication either in print or on www.PsychiatricTimes.com.
(Free registration is required for access to Pyschiatric Times Editorial.)
Related content:
DSM-5 on Psychiatric Times January 3 – December 16, 2011
December 16, 2011
The Debate Over DSM-5: We Invite Your ViewsNovember 23, 2011
DSM-5: APA Responds to American Counseling Association ConcernsNovember 21, 2011
DSM-5: Petitions, Predictions, and PrescriptionsNovember 17, 2011
Counselors Turn Against DSM-5: Can APA Ignore 120,000 Users?November 11, 2011
DSM-5: Living Document or Dead on Arrival?November 10, 2011
The User’s Revolt Against DSM-5: Will It Work?November 8, 2011
APA Responds Lamely to the Petition to Reform DSM-5November 7, 2011
The Great DSM-5 Personality BazaarNovember 4, 2011
Why Psychiatrists Should Sign The Petition To Reform DSM-5November 3, 2011
Why Doesn’t DSM-5 Defend Itself? Perhaps Because No Defense Is PossibleNovember 2, 2011
DSM-5 Will Not Be Credible Without An Independent Scientific ReviewNovember 1, 2011
DSM-5 Against Everyone Else: Research Types Just Don’t Understand The Clinical WorldOctober 31, 2011
What Would A Useful DSM-5 Look Like? And An Update On The Petition DriveOctober 26, 2011
Petition Against DSM-5 Gets Off To Racing Start: A Game Changer?October 24, 2011
Psychologists Petition Against DSM-5: Users Revolt Should Capture APA Attention
Several divisions of the American Psychological Association have just written an open letter highly critical of DSM-5.October 13, 2011
Should Temper Tantrums Be Made Into A DSM-5 Diagnosis?October 12, 2011
Do We Need a DSM-V?September 30, 2011
PTSD, DSM-5, and Forensic MisuseSeptember 29, 2011
An Alternative To The DSM-5 Personality ProposalsSeptember 21, 2011
Why Psychiatry Is Wonderful—Even If DSM-5 Isn’tSeptember 14, 2011
DSM-5 Proposals Should Undergo An Independent Cochrane Review Of Scientific EvidenceSeptember 13, 2011
Warning to DSM-5: Mental Health Clinicians Can Use ICD-10-CMAugust 23, 2011
The Leaders’ Report on DSM-5August 10, 2011
DSM-5 Stubbornly Circles The Wagons Against Opposition From The Field
Bob Spitzer was prophetic 4 years ago when he warned that the closed DSM-5 process would lead to a flawed DSM-5 product…August 5, 2011
Scandalous Off Label Use Of Antipsychotics: Another Warning For DSM-5July 27, 2011
DSM-5 Will Further Inflate the ADD Bubble: Child Work Group Fails to Learn From ExperienceJuly 25, 2011
The British Psychological Society Condemns DSM-5June 8, 2011
Who Needs DSM-5? A Strong Warning Comes From Professional CounselorsMay 12, 2011
DSM-5 Rejects Coercive Paraphilia: Once Again Confirming That Rape Is Not A Mental DisorderApril 28, 2011
Marijuana Withdrawal Syndrome: Should Cannabis Withdrawal Disorder Be Included in DSM-5?April 15, 2011
The Constant DSM-5 Missed Deadlines And Their Consequences: the Future is Closing In
Aside from its reckless proposals for dangerous new diagnoses, the most characteristic thing about DSM-5 has been its remarkably poor planning…April 13, 2011
DSM-5 and the NIMH Research Domain Criteria ProjectApril 11, 2011
DSM-5 Will Medicalize Everyday Worries Into Generalized Anxiety DisorderFebruary 25, 2011
DSM-5: When To Change and When Not to ChangeFebruary 22, 2011
Temper Tantrums, Mental disorder, and DSM-5: The Case for CautionJanuary 25, 2011
DSM-5 Promotes A 60% Jump In The Rate Of Alcohol Use DisordersJanuary 20, 2011
An Independent View of DSM-5January 19, 2011
DSM-5: A Year End SummaryJanuary 11, 2011
DSM-5 and Practical ConsequencesJanuary 10, 2011
Does Research Support “Craving” as a Core Symptom of Substance Use Disorders in DSM-5?January 3, 2011
DSM-5: Dissent From Within