Two resign from DSM-5 Personality Disorders Work Group over “seriously flawed” proposals
July 12, 2012
Two resign from DSM-5 Personality Disorders Work Group over “seriously flawed” proposals
Post #191 Shortlink: http://wp.me/pKrrB-2kN
Update at July 24, 2012: Additional reporting from Straight.com, Vancouver, on the resignations of two members of the DSM-5 Personality Disorders Work Group:
UBC prof emeritus John Livesley and Dutch expert quit DSM-V committee defining personality disorders
Charlie Smith | July 23, 2012
Update at July 16, 2012:
In the July issue of Clinical Psychology & Psychology there is an Editorial and two Commentaries around DSM-5 proposals for Personality and Personality Disorders.
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0879/earlyview
Commentary
No abstract is available for this article.
Personality Disorder Proposal for DSM-5: A Heroic and Innovative but Nevertheless Fundamentally Flawed Attempt to Improve DSM-IV
Roel Verheul
Article first published online: 12 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1809
Editorials
No abstract is available for this article.
DSM-5 Personality Disorders: Stop Before it is Too Late
Paul Emmelkamp and Mick Power
Article first published online: 3 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1807
Commentary
No abstract is available for this article.
Disorder in the Proposed DSM-5 Classification of Personality Disorders
W. John Livesley
Article first published online: 3 JUL 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1808
Roel Verheul, Ph.D. and W. John Livesley, M.D., Ph.D. resigned as members of the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group in April.
Dr Roel Verheul is CEO of de Viersprong, Netherlands Institute for Personality Disorders.
Dr. John Livesley is Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia.
Allen Frances, M.D. who chaired the DSM-IV Task Force blogs at DSM 5 in Distress. Drs Verheul and Livesley have written to Dr Frances setting out their concerns for what they believe to be “seriously flawed proposals” and “a truly stunning disregard for evidence.”
DSM5 in Distress
The DSM’s impact on mental health practice and research.by Allen Frances, M.D.
Two Who Resigned From DSM-5 Explain Why
They spell out the defects in the personality sectionAllen Frances, M.D. | July 11, 2012
Roel Verheul and John Livesley both felt compelled to resign from the DSM-5 Personality Disorders Work Group. Here is an email from them describing what went wrong in the preparation of this section:
“…Regrettably, the Work Group has been unable to capitalize on the opportunity and has advanced a proposal that is seriously flawed. It has also demonstrated an inability to respond to constructive feedback both from within the Work Group and from the many experts in the field who have communicated their concerns directly and indirectly. We also regret the need to resign because we were the only International members of the Work Group which is now without representation from outside the US…”
“…Early on in the DSM-5 process, we developed major concerns about the Work Group’s mode of working and its emerging recommendations that we communicated to the Work Group and Task Force… We considered the current proposal to be fundamentally flawed and decided that it would be wrong of us to appear to collude with it any longer…As we see it, there are two major problems with the proposal…”
Proposals for the DSM-5 Personality Disorders as issued for the third and final stakeholder review can be read here on the DSM-5 Development site.